No genre of music walks the line between greatness and stupidity as often and as gracefully as psychedelic music, and nowhere is that more apparent than in the artwork that often accompanies the albums. Some of it is great, some of it is terrible, and all of it is pretty ridiculous on some level. So without judging the merits of the music contained within these records, here are the 10 albums I feel most embody the precarious balance between mind-expanding mysticism and silly cliches found in most psychedelic music. I still don't know what exactly that is, but usually some combination of garish color, barely legible text, and deliberate non-sequiturs which may or may not symbolize something will do. Without further adieu:
Tom's Top Ten Most Psychedelic Album Covers:
1. The Beatles - Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band - I said I wouldn't judge this based on the music, and I'm sticking by that. But the famous cover to this album is great for some of the exact same reasons that the Beatles were great: it takes a previously existing aesthetic and solidifies it, redefines it, and makes it 1,000 times better than it ever was before all at the same time.
2. The Incredible String Band - 5000 Spirits or the Layers of the Onion - Night and day, alpha and omega, yin and yang, the entire earth at the center, and... yup, there's an onion at the bottom.
3. The Zombies - Odessey and Oracle - Note that I didn't misspell "odyssey," the Zombies did. I have to think that sales of any fabric with a paisley pattern shot up about 1000% in England during the late 1960s.
4. The Dukes of Stratosphear - 25 O'Clock - For those not in the know, the Dukes of Stratosphear were actually XTC in disguise, so this isn't so much the genuine article as an homage of sorts, with the benefit of 20 years of hindsight and far lower levels of LSD. Like all good parodies (and like the music contained within), it's done with no small amount of affection and sincerity.
5. Cream - Disraeli Gears - Of all the records from the late 60's on this list, none were more obviously meant to be viewed not on a 5" CD cover (that obviously being nonexistent at the time), but a 12" LP cover, mainly due to the fact that there is as much crap crammed onto that as can possibly fit without needing a microscope to see them all. I want to say "everything but the kitchen sink," but I'm sure the kitchen sink is somewhere on there. To think that Eric Clapton, faux-blues-traditionalist, was a mere couple years in the past (and a couple years in the future) when this was made...
6. The West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band - Part One - I really can't make heads or tails of this one. Were they trying to suggest that their album was recorded inside a giant kidney?
7. The Strawberry Alarm Clock - Wake Up... It's Tomorrow - These guys single-handedly ruined this entire genre for everybody. In a post-"Incense and Peppermints" world, how could anybody possibly take the idea of psychedelia seriously? Everything about the Strawberry Alarm Clock embodies some cliche or stereotype about psychedelic music. This garish nightmare of a cover must have been a sight to behold in full LP size.
8. XTC - Oranges and Lemons - XTC have the distinction of making this list twice, with two different names. Again, this is more of a knowing wink than the real deal, but still, how could I not include an album cover that has a guitar with a horn on the end that's spewing out bubbles? Or something like that. The other guitar appears to have a headstock that turns into a rocket ship.
9. Todd Rundgren - A Wizard, A True Star - I have this one in its original 12" LP format, and I have to hold it at arm's length to look at it. Notice that Todd's left eye is surrounded by an ear... and also that it is bleeding. I think. This is 60s psychedelia filtered through a 70s coke binge.
10. The Jimi Hendrix Experience - Axis: Bold As Love - Nobody in the late 60s was as brazen with their faux-Indian-mysticism as the Experience were here.
Honorable mentions:
Pink Floyd - The Piper at the Gates of Dawn - Part 2 of the paisley revolution.
Donovan - Sunshine Superman - The perfect embodiment of Donovan's foppish and oh-so-British version of psychedelic folk-pop. I'm just mad about Saffron...
The Beach Boys - Friends - In the late 60s after Brian Wilson crashed and burned with the failure of Smile, the Beach Boys apparently decided to get together in Brian's room, smoke a whole bunch of pot, and talk about how much they like each other. And this album popped out. It's actually pretty good.
So that's that. Feel free to suggest examples I may have missed.
Friday, November 18, 2005
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
No Love lost between cousin Mike and Brian
News from the world of music doesn't usually make me mad. My reactions range from sadness (when Elliott Smith died) to mild annoyance (when the Beta Band broke up, for instance) to exasperation (anything involving Eminem), but rarely do I feel genuinely angry.
That changed yesterday when I found out that Mike Love is suing Brian Wilson over Wilson's Smile album.
I won't even pretend to look at this from an objective viewpoint. I hate Mike Love. He's selfish, he cares about nothing except money, he undermined his cousin Brian's confidence and mental health at the worst possible time (more on that in a minute), and he's so insecure about his baldness that he hasn't appeared in public without a hat for 40 years and counting. And as much as I hate Mike Love, that's how much I love Brian Wilson, the genius behind everything good the Beach Boys ever did, the mastermind, the architect, the brilliant songwriter who easily ranks as one of the best America has ever produced. He's fought through decades of addiction, depression, and a criminally manipulative doctor to make one of the most unlikely comebacks in the history of rock music, culminating with the completion of his long-lost masterpiece, the intended 1967 follow-up to Pet Sounds, Smile.
One of the main reasons for my anti-Love, pro-Wilson bias lies at the heart of this lawsuit: Mike Love is the single biggest reason Smile was never finished in the first place. He vehemently made his feelings known: that he had no idea what the album was about, that he wanted the Beach Boys to go back to making simple surfing songs, and that he considered Smile to be "Brian's ego music." There are many other contributing factors to Brian's abandonment of Smile, but the fact that his own relative and bandmate was attempting (successfully) to undermine the entire thing was probably the single biggest factor in deep-sixing it.
Of course, now that it's finally been finished, and released to near-universal acclaim, Love is naturally unhappy about it. Love, or his attorney, or both, are saying, without any trace of irony, that Brian promoted Smile in a manner that "shamelessly misappropriated Mike Love's songs, likeness and the Beach Boys trademark, as well as the Smile album itself." Never mind that Love wanted nothing to do with Smile when he had his chance back in the late 60's, or that he co-wrote exactly one (1) song that ended up on the album (that would be his lyrical contribution to "Good Vibrations," which ended up being dropped for Tony Asher's original lyrics for Smile anyway), or that the only reason Smile was released under the name "Brian Wilson" and not "The Beach Boys" is because Mike Love himself sued for exclusive use of the name (and won for reasons I can't even begin to fathom). I have no clue how Love's "likeness" is being misappropriated here. The only mentions of his name I can think of throughout the entire blitz of promotion and media coverage over the past two years have been along the lines of "Fellow Beach Boy Mike Love was extremely critical of Smile," and that's not slander, that's a fact.
So Mike Love wants re-imbursement for "millions of dollars in illicit profits," and meanwhile Brian Wilson raised $210,000 for Hurricane Katrina relief, and made 500 personal phone calls to fans who donated $100 or more (donations he also matched). Clearly Brian's the bad guy there. I don't know why I'm so surprised by this, but to me, it's more proof that Mike Love is a petty man with no class, no shame, and apparently no brain underneath that big bald dome of his.
That changed yesterday when I found out that Mike Love is suing Brian Wilson over Wilson's Smile album.
I won't even pretend to look at this from an objective viewpoint. I hate Mike Love. He's selfish, he cares about nothing except money, he undermined his cousin Brian's confidence and mental health at the worst possible time (more on that in a minute), and he's so insecure about his baldness that he hasn't appeared in public without a hat for 40 years and counting. And as much as I hate Mike Love, that's how much I love Brian Wilson, the genius behind everything good the Beach Boys ever did, the mastermind, the architect, the brilliant songwriter who easily ranks as one of the best America has ever produced. He's fought through decades of addiction, depression, and a criminally manipulative doctor to make one of the most unlikely comebacks in the history of rock music, culminating with the completion of his long-lost masterpiece, the intended 1967 follow-up to Pet Sounds, Smile.
One of the main reasons for my anti-Love, pro-Wilson bias lies at the heart of this lawsuit: Mike Love is the single biggest reason Smile was never finished in the first place. He vehemently made his feelings known: that he had no idea what the album was about, that he wanted the Beach Boys to go back to making simple surfing songs, and that he considered Smile to be "Brian's ego music." There are many other contributing factors to Brian's abandonment of Smile, but the fact that his own relative and bandmate was attempting (successfully) to undermine the entire thing was probably the single biggest factor in deep-sixing it.
Of course, now that it's finally been finished, and released to near-universal acclaim, Love is naturally unhappy about it. Love, or his attorney, or both, are saying, without any trace of irony, that Brian promoted Smile in a manner that "shamelessly misappropriated Mike Love's songs, likeness and the Beach Boys trademark, as well as the Smile album itself." Never mind that Love wanted nothing to do with Smile when he had his chance back in the late 60's, or that he co-wrote exactly one (1) song that ended up on the album (that would be his lyrical contribution to "Good Vibrations," which ended up being dropped for Tony Asher's original lyrics for Smile anyway), or that the only reason Smile was released under the name "Brian Wilson" and not "The Beach Boys" is because Mike Love himself sued for exclusive use of the name (and won for reasons I can't even begin to fathom). I have no clue how Love's "likeness" is being misappropriated here. The only mentions of his name I can think of throughout the entire blitz of promotion and media coverage over the past two years have been along the lines of "Fellow Beach Boy Mike Love was extremely critical of Smile," and that's not slander, that's a fact.
So Mike Love wants re-imbursement for "millions of dollars in illicit profits," and meanwhile Brian Wilson raised $210,000 for Hurricane Katrina relief, and made 500 personal phone calls to fans who donated $100 or more (donations he also matched). Clearly Brian's the bad guy there. I don't know why I'm so surprised by this, but to me, it's more proof that Mike Love is a petty man with no class, no shame, and apparently no brain underneath that big bald dome of his.
Monday, November 07, 2005
A Fiery Furnaces Family Reunion
The Fiery Furnaces' Rehearsing My Choir is the type of album that inadvertently shows how far I'm willing to go to try to accept an artist on their own terms. I personally think it's great, but it seems perfectly logical to me that some people aren't exactly gung ho about a concept album documenting the life of a band's grandmother, told largely through spoken word. I can imagine some people are really, for lack of a better termed, weirded out by hearing the wavering voice of an old woman recalling Depression-Era Chicago over a tack piano backdrop, especially coming from a band that was, once upon a time, all the way back in 2003, the epitome of a hip underground New York band.
We knew from last year's Blueberry Boat that the Fiery Furnaces were no ordinary post-punk/garage/alternative/whatever band, but Rehearsing My Choir is a whole new depth of weirdness. If the closest reference point for Blueberry Boat was the Who (a comparison I've never really found apt, except for the fact that the Furnaces were churning out distant descendants of "Rael," which I guess was the whole point), Rehearsing My Choir is somewhere between Gilbert & Sullivan and Philip Glass, and it's every bit as strange as that sounds.
As mentioned before, it's a concept album and collaboration between the brother and sister who make up the Furnaces, Matthew and Eleanor Friedberger, and their grandmother, Olga Sarantos. Most of the dialogue (and it's certainly better classified as "dialogue" than "lyrics") is spoken, and any overarching plot is almost indecipherable in the meandering free-associative nature of the songs, like a Faulkner novel set to music and spanning over half a century. The Philip Glass influence comes from the nonlinear narrative, the spoken words over repetitive (dare I say minimalist?) background, and the repeated out-of-context phrases thrown in for good measure ("Faster hammers! Faster hammers!"). It really isn't too far away from Einstein on the Beach. The Gilbert & Sullivan comes from the strangely vaudevillian nature of a lot of it, with something resembling an opera on top of it, and all that aforementioned tack piano.
So why do I think it's great? As a rule, I'll admit I give extra points for weirdness, and this is as weird as pop music comes lately. But it's also strangely entrancing. Once I managed to lose myself in the songs a little, I realized how intricately tied together the whole thing is, despite the apparent lack of focus. It's deceptively well put together, and it's so odd to try to take in all at once that I didn't even notice all of the interconnected musical themes until the third or fourth listen. There are no hooks or singalong melodies to speak of, but it's strangely catchy nonetheless.
As a whole, Rehearsing My Choir is inferior to Blueberry Boat, but the Fiery Furnaces, even when they're not at the top of their game, are that rare group who make me excited about the possibilities of pop music, which is one of the best compliments I can pay to anybody. I can't wait to hear what they have in store for next year.
We knew from last year's Blueberry Boat that the Fiery Furnaces were no ordinary post-punk/garage/alternative/whatever band, but Rehearsing My Choir is a whole new depth of weirdness. If the closest reference point for Blueberry Boat was the Who (a comparison I've never really found apt, except for the fact that the Furnaces were churning out distant descendants of "Rael," which I guess was the whole point), Rehearsing My Choir is somewhere between Gilbert & Sullivan and Philip Glass, and it's every bit as strange as that sounds.
As mentioned before, it's a concept album and collaboration between the brother and sister who make up the Furnaces, Matthew and Eleanor Friedberger, and their grandmother, Olga Sarantos. Most of the dialogue (and it's certainly better classified as "dialogue" than "lyrics") is spoken, and any overarching plot is almost indecipherable in the meandering free-associative nature of the songs, like a Faulkner novel set to music and spanning over half a century. The Philip Glass influence comes from the nonlinear narrative, the spoken words over repetitive (dare I say minimalist?) background, and the repeated out-of-context phrases thrown in for good measure ("Faster hammers! Faster hammers!"). It really isn't too far away from Einstein on the Beach. The Gilbert & Sullivan comes from the strangely vaudevillian nature of a lot of it, with something resembling an opera on top of it, and all that aforementioned tack piano.
So why do I think it's great? As a rule, I'll admit I give extra points for weirdness, and this is as weird as pop music comes lately. But it's also strangely entrancing. Once I managed to lose myself in the songs a little, I realized how intricately tied together the whole thing is, despite the apparent lack of focus. It's deceptively well put together, and it's so odd to try to take in all at once that I didn't even notice all of the interconnected musical themes until the third or fourth listen. There are no hooks or singalong melodies to speak of, but it's strangely catchy nonetheless.
As a whole, Rehearsing My Choir is inferior to Blueberry Boat, but the Fiery Furnaces, even when they're not at the top of their game, are that rare group who make me excited about the possibilities of pop music, which is one of the best compliments I can pay to anybody. I can't wait to hear what they have in store for next year.
Friday, November 04, 2005
Glaciers, geysers, and other Icelandic cliches
Let's clear some things up about Sigur Ros right now: Their "Scandinavian mystic elf" schtick is completely transparent. Their singer has laid down, to the best of my recollection, a grand total of maybe three different vocal parts (three is generous, considering that there was roughly one on their last album). They're too pretentious for words (this should be plain to see, considering that their last album was titled ( ) and was sung in a supposedly invented language). Every single one of their albums is about twice as long as it needs to be.
And yet... I love them!
I'll admit I fell for the whole ( ) gimmick hook, line, and sinker when it first came out. I loved its predecessor, Agaetis Byrjun, and was literally counting down the days until its release, and as a testament to my fandom I'd just paid almost $50 for a ticket to see them, and the ticket wasn't even here in Philly. It was in New York, which meant driving three hours each way, and paying another $20 to park. If I'd known they'd play Philly the next spring, I might have reconsidered. And when I got ( ), the idea of releasing an album of pop songs with no titles and no actual lyrics seemed like the greatest thing ever. The fact that I couldn't tell "Hopelandic" from their usual Icelandic lyrics anyway made little difference.
But I seem to have soured on them over the last couple years. The main reason for that is that I stopped looking at them through my rose-colored glasses that allowed me to overlook all of their ridiculousness and the flaws I listed earlier. The result? It's probably been a good year and a half since I had them on, and even then it was probably the Ba Ba Ti Ki Di Do EP that resulted from their collaboration with Merce Cunningham and Radiohead. So here I am, listening to their first album since ( ), Takk..., having just recently passed up an opportunity to see their amazing live show for a third time, and how do I feel?
Pretty good.
I can't quite put my finger on it, and I've never been able to, but, like Boards of Canada, the best Sigur Ros moments are mind-blowingly amazing for reasons that are unknown to most people. I have no idea if they're just amazingly talented and passionate, or formulaic and manipulative, but whatever they've been doing for the past six years or so, it's worked, and it still does.
One thing is for sure: these guys know their way around a dramatic climax, and, like everything else they've done, Takk... is packed to the brim with them. Some are certainly more effective than others ("Milano" comes to mind, as does "Saeglopur"), and those moments are worthy of the best of Agaetis Byrjun, but overall, it's merely ok. Frankly, the whole thing is starting to get old. I get the feeling I'm supposed to hear "Svo Hljott" as a dramatic climax to the entire album, but by the time I get there, I've heard it already. About eight times, by that point.
The real joys for me are the unexpected moments, the moments that display a hint of creativity and subtlety. Hear that horn section in "Se Lest"? That is what brings the smile to my face. It's strinkingly reminiscent of Agaetis Byrjun's "Staralfur," which has a similar passage with horns and strings that ranks as not only my favorite moment in the entire Sigur Ros catalog, but one of my favorite moments in any song, ever. The first time I heard that part in "Staralfur" I was dumbstruck with awe. It sounded like the band suddenly stepped into a time warp and decided to march down the aisle of a cathedral to Handel's arrangement of their own song. It was indescribably wonderful.
But do you see where I've ended up? I started off talking about their new album, and the best I could manage was a smiling reminiscence of one of their older ones. And that just about sums up Takk... It's not bad, but I hardly envision myself ever needing to hear it too often when it sounds so similar to something that's so much better.
Short note: all of the Icelandic accents and written oddities have been Anglified for the purpose of this post, because Blogger does not seem to take kindly to non-English symbols. So if you cringe at Agaetis Byrjun written without all its accents and whatnot, I apologize.
And yet... I love them!
I'll admit I fell for the whole ( ) gimmick hook, line, and sinker when it first came out. I loved its predecessor, Agaetis Byrjun, and was literally counting down the days until its release, and as a testament to my fandom I'd just paid almost $50 for a ticket to see them, and the ticket wasn't even here in Philly. It was in New York, which meant driving three hours each way, and paying another $20 to park. If I'd known they'd play Philly the next spring, I might have reconsidered. And when I got ( ), the idea of releasing an album of pop songs with no titles and no actual lyrics seemed like the greatest thing ever. The fact that I couldn't tell "Hopelandic" from their usual Icelandic lyrics anyway made little difference.
But I seem to have soured on them over the last couple years. The main reason for that is that I stopped looking at them through my rose-colored glasses that allowed me to overlook all of their ridiculousness and the flaws I listed earlier. The result? It's probably been a good year and a half since I had them on, and even then it was probably the Ba Ba Ti Ki Di Do EP that resulted from their collaboration with Merce Cunningham and Radiohead. So here I am, listening to their first album since ( ), Takk..., having just recently passed up an opportunity to see their amazing live show for a third time, and how do I feel?
Pretty good.
I can't quite put my finger on it, and I've never been able to, but, like Boards of Canada, the best Sigur Ros moments are mind-blowingly amazing for reasons that are unknown to most people. I have no idea if they're just amazingly talented and passionate, or formulaic and manipulative, but whatever they've been doing for the past six years or so, it's worked, and it still does.
One thing is for sure: these guys know their way around a dramatic climax, and, like everything else they've done, Takk... is packed to the brim with them. Some are certainly more effective than others ("Milano" comes to mind, as does "Saeglopur"), and those moments are worthy of the best of Agaetis Byrjun, but overall, it's merely ok. Frankly, the whole thing is starting to get old. I get the feeling I'm supposed to hear "Svo Hljott" as a dramatic climax to the entire album, but by the time I get there, I've heard it already. About eight times, by that point.
The real joys for me are the unexpected moments, the moments that display a hint of creativity and subtlety. Hear that horn section in "Se Lest"? That is what brings the smile to my face. It's strinkingly reminiscent of Agaetis Byrjun's "Staralfur," which has a similar passage with horns and strings that ranks as not only my favorite moment in the entire Sigur Ros catalog, but one of my favorite moments in any song, ever. The first time I heard that part in "Staralfur" I was dumbstruck with awe. It sounded like the band suddenly stepped into a time warp and decided to march down the aisle of a cathedral to Handel's arrangement of their own song. It was indescribably wonderful.
But do you see where I've ended up? I started off talking about their new album, and the best I could manage was a smiling reminiscence of one of their older ones. And that just about sums up Takk... It's not bad, but I hardly envision myself ever needing to hear it too often when it sounds so similar to something that's so much better.
Short note: all of the Icelandic accents and written oddities have been Anglified for the purpose of this post, because Blogger does not seem to take kindly to non-English symbols. So if you cringe at Agaetis Byrjun written without all its accents and whatnot, I apologize.
Friday, October 28, 2005
The Phillies actually responding to criticism? Really?
It may or may not be true, but at this point, it seems like the Phillies are actually committed to change, and addressing complaints. First came the firing of Ed Wade. Now, they're planning to move back the left field wall at Citizens Bank Park.
This has been a subject of some debate in the two years played at the park, and as you may remember, I had my own theories about it as well. Considering that the attitude of Phillies management for about as long as I can remember has been "It's not a problem unless we decide it's a problem," who would have thought something would actually be done about it?
So I'm glad for that, even if Pat Burrell's home run total drops by five next season, and David Bell's total drops to zero. And I'll say this much too: I wouldn't at all be surprised if we go to the park next year and find the left wall exactly as I described in my previous post.
It's sort of cool to be sort of vindicated.
This has been a subject of some debate in the two years played at the park, and as you may remember, I had my own theories about it as well. Considering that the attitude of Phillies management for about as long as I can remember has been "It's not a problem unless we decide it's a problem," who would have thought something would actually be done about it?
So I'm glad for that, even if Pat Burrell's home run total drops by five next season, and David Bell's total drops to zero. And I'll say this much too: I wouldn't at all be surprised if we go to the park next year and find the left wall exactly as I described in my previous post.
It's sort of cool to be sort of vindicated.
Thursday, October 27, 2005
A moment for Elliott Smith
If ever I take survey of how many Elliott Smith albums I have, I always have to remind myself to bump up the number by one, because I somehow always forget his posthumous album, From a Basement on the Hill. If there's any album in my collection I never really gave a fair chance to, that one is it, and since we just passed the one year anniversary of that album's release (October 19) and the two year anniversary of Smith's death (October 21), I figured I'd give it another chance to impress me, despite the fact that there are about 300 new releases from the past month that I want to hear.
Unfortunately, I don't really think any higher of it now than I did a year ago. The long layoff probably helped some of the songs stay fresh (it's probably been a good 10 months since I had it on), but some others sound worse with age.
First, the good parts: "Coast to Coast" and "Don't Go Down" are gritty rockers that seem much more appealing than they did before, with thunderous drumming courtesy of the Flaming Lips' Steven Drozd on the former. When I first these songs, I cringed because they "didn't sound like Elliott." At this point I'm ok with that, and if David Bowie can do all the things he's done and still be great, I can't really hold a decision to try to play some crunchy electric guitar-driven songs against Elliott.
The real problem is the ones that do "sound like Elliott." "Memory Lane" and "A Fond Farewell" can either be counted as self-parody or a lazy attempt to recreate old magic, and the same goes for "Pretty (Ugly Before)," "Strung Out Again," and "Let's Get Lost," especially the latter, with its introduction more or less stolen straight from "Color Bars," from 2000's Figure 8.
The really interesting aspect of this is trying to figure out if there's some reason outside of the music itself that I don't really like Smith's final album. Is it possible that no matter what was released, I would hear it and say that it wasn't what he wanted? That's a very distinct possibility, but I think the real reason is simply that I'm just not really a big Elliott Smith fan anymore. Even by the time Smith reached his unfortunate end two years ago, it'd been a couple years since I listened to any of his albums. I hung on to him for a little while after the Figure 8 fervor died down (in truth, I didn't really get into him until around when that album was released), but eventually moved on. I took note of the occasional updates on the progress of From a Basement on the Hill (which I think had a different working title and was originally to be 2 discs), but didn't really follow it with much interest. When he died, I briefly had another fling with Either/Or and XO, but neither of those nor any of the other ones get much play now. I'll always recall those albums fondly, and I still get enjoyment out of them the few times I do put them on (I actually have no idea where my copy of Either/Or is at the moment), but they'll probably hold more sentimental value than anything else.
My real "oops" moment was when I passed on what turned out to be my final opportunity to see him live to spend time with a girl I was dating at the time. We were both fans of Elliott (me more than her, even if she did hang on to my copy of XO for what seemed like a year), but she was in a different town, and Elliott was two miles away. If I'd known that the relationship wasn't going to last (although we are still good friends, and she still apparently admires my cat, as can be seen in the comments to the last post), and that Elliott Smith was going to kill himself four months later, I probably would have done things differently, but that's how things work out sometimes.
Unfortunately, I don't really think any higher of it now than I did a year ago. The long layoff probably helped some of the songs stay fresh (it's probably been a good 10 months since I had it on), but some others sound worse with age.
First, the good parts: "Coast to Coast" and "Don't Go Down" are gritty rockers that seem much more appealing than they did before, with thunderous drumming courtesy of the Flaming Lips' Steven Drozd on the former. When I first these songs, I cringed because they "didn't sound like Elliott." At this point I'm ok with that, and if David Bowie can do all the things he's done and still be great, I can't really hold a decision to try to play some crunchy electric guitar-driven songs against Elliott.
The real problem is the ones that do "sound like Elliott." "Memory Lane" and "A Fond Farewell" can either be counted as self-parody or a lazy attempt to recreate old magic, and the same goes for "Pretty (Ugly Before)," "Strung Out Again," and "Let's Get Lost," especially the latter, with its introduction more or less stolen straight from "Color Bars," from 2000's Figure 8.
The really interesting aspect of this is trying to figure out if there's some reason outside of the music itself that I don't really like Smith's final album. Is it possible that no matter what was released, I would hear it and say that it wasn't what he wanted? That's a very distinct possibility, but I think the real reason is simply that I'm just not really a big Elliott Smith fan anymore. Even by the time Smith reached his unfortunate end two years ago, it'd been a couple years since I listened to any of his albums. I hung on to him for a little while after the Figure 8 fervor died down (in truth, I didn't really get into him until around when that album was released), but eventually moved on. I took note of the occasional updates on the progress of From a Basement on the Hill (which I think had a different working title and was originally to be 2 discs), but didn't really follow it with much interest. When he died, I briefly had another fling with Either/Or and XO, but neither of those nor any of the other ones get much play now. I'll always recall those albums fondly, and I still get enjoyment out of them the few times I do put them on (I actually have no idea where my copy of Either/Or is at the moment), but they'll probably hold more sentimental value than anything else.
My real "oops" moment was when I passed on what turned out to be my final opportunity to see him live to spend time with a girl I was dating at the time. We were both fans of Elliott (me more than her, even if she did hang on to my copy of XO for what seemed like a year), but she was in a different town, and Elliott was two miles away. If I'd known that the relationship wasn't going to last (although we are still good friends, and she still apparently admires my cat, as can be seen in the comments to the last post), and that Elliott Smith was going to kill himself four months later, I probably would have done things differently, but that's how things work out sometimes.
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
New Boards of Canada = Happy Tom
If I had to pick an artist or band in the last decade or so as my favorite, it would probably be Boards of Canada. I wouldn't necessarily call them the best in that time period, they're certainly not the most important by any definition, and if I had to pick one artist's body of work to take to the hypothetical desert island, it probably wouldn't be them, but nobody else in recent memory has made music so beautifully transcendent.
Boards of Canada are the quintessential group whose sum is greater than its parts. The parts can be described and analyzed, and influences can be heard, but the effect that is felt when the music meets the mind and soul is indescribable. The feeling of bliss brought on by the best of their music is truly otherworldly, and it simply cannot be described, which usually leads me to make pointless statements like, "If the monolith from 2001: A Space Odyssey was a DJ, it would play Boards of Canada."
Their new album, The Campfire Headphase, released on Tuesday, is not drastically different from their previous two (those being 2002's Geogaddi and 1998's Music Has the Right to Children). The only major difference is the addition of guitars, a sound that is jarring at first, but easy to get used to, and in the end, the guitars are only worth noting because they blend so seamlessly with the established and instantly recognizable Boards of Canada sound.
Those looking for a major artistic development in The Campfire Headphase will be disappointed. If anything, it sounds more like their landmark debut album than Geogaddi does. This may be a problem for some, but I'm perfectly ok with it. The best moments on any Boards of Canada album, The Campfire Headphase included, are so transcendent, so engulfing and soothing, that "artistic development" seems like a pointless concept, and whether or not something is "good" becomes meaningless. With a pair of headphones and the right mood, a song like "Satellite Anthem Icarus" doesn't seem like the work of artistic stagnation, it seems like the end result of all musical evolution. It seems like bliss in its purest form, timeless beauty that's impossible to dissect. And it seems impossible and pointless to try to go anywhere else with it, because it's already in the best place it'll ever be.
All of which is to say that Boards of Canada still may not be the best, most important, or most prolific group around, but they're still my favorite.
Boards of Canada are the quintessential group whose sum is greater than its parts. The parts can be described and analyzed, and influences can be heard, but the effect that is felt when the music meets the mind and soul is indescribable. The feeling of bliss brought on by the best of their music is truly otherworldly, and it simply cannot be described, which usually leads me to make pointless statements like, "If the monolith from 2001: A Space Odyssey was a DJ, it would play Boards of Canada."
Their new album, The Campfire Headphase, released on Tuesday, is not drastically different from their previous two (those being 2002's Geogaddi and 1998's Music Has the Right to Children). The only major difference is the addition of guitars, a sound that is jarring at first, but easy to get used to, and in the end, the guitars are only worth noting because they blend so seamlessly with the established and instantly recognizable Boards of Canada sound.
Those looking for a major artistic development in The Campfire Headphase will be disappointed. If anything, it sounds more like their landmark debut album than Geogaddi does. This may be a problem for some, but I'm perfectly ok with it. The best moments on any Boards of Canada album, The Campfire Headphase included, are so transcendent, so engulfing and soothing, that "artistic development" seems like a pointless concept, and whether or not something is "good" becomes meaningless. With a pair of headphones and the right mood, a song like "Satellite Anthem Icarus" doesn't seem like the work of artistic stagnation, it seems like the end result of all musical evolution. It seems like bliss in its purest form, timeless beauty that's impossible to dissect. And it seems impossible and pointless to try to go anywhere else with it, because it's already in the best place it'll ever be.
All of which is to say that Boards of Canada still may not be the best, most important, or most prolific group around, but they're still my favorite.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)